On 10/17/13 12:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote:
> It is worth mentioning that a system with 1TB worth of 512-byte ARC buffers 
> would again favor an AVL tree implementation unless you again increase the 
> size of the hash table even more.

Come on, do you seriously think we should tune for a system so hugely
out of whack? :)

-- 
Saso
_______________________________________________
developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer

Reply via email to