On Oct 18, 2013, at 10:44 AM, Prakash Surya <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, the more I think about it, the less it worries me. Let's ignore > that statement for now. > > We have users tweaking the ARC limits regularly, so I was concerned > about the case where the ARC max is set much lower than physical RAM. > But even if a user sets the ARC max to 5% of RAM, the table size is > only 2% the size of ARC max. Not bad, imo.
Hi Prakash, Can you share with us what ARC limits are being tuned regularly? I am aware of arc_c_max on non-Solaris implementations. If there are others, then perhaps we can come up with better self-tuning rules. -- richard -- [email protected] +1-760-896-4422
_______________________________________________ developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
