On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Bob Friesenhahn via illumos-zfs <[email protected]> wrote: > I have also heard in the past that Illumos/zfs is not influenced by requests > from posix_fadvise() either.
That's correct. We've recently been working on an implementation for this issue. Our implementation handles POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED well for reads, but the asynchronous nature of writes is more difficult to handle. Anyone else interested in this? --Will. _______________________________________________ developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
