On 11/09/2015 16:36, George Wilson wrote: > I don't think L2ARC can be shared only spare devices can be shared.
But why? And I do not mean multiple ownership of the cache devices. I mean that if a pool with a cache device is imported then the cache device could be used by ARC for the second level caching of data from any pool. > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Andriy Gapon <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > I am curious what was the original reason to not allow sharing of cache > devices > (L2ARC) between pools? > After all, the main ARC is shared for all pools. > If more control is needed, perhaps we could have a pool property like > shared-cache-devices (but less verbose) which would tell if data from > other > pools can be cached on this pool's cache devices. > > -- > Andriy Gapon > > _______________________________________________ > developer mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer > > -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
