On 11/09/2015 16:47, George Wilson wrote: > The ideas was that only one pool could own it so that failover would be > possible and the cache device would follow that pool. It also would be > required for persistent l2arc. > > However, it should be possible to create an independent l2arc which never > fails over but can be added to multiple pools. It would not be a trivial > implementation but seems doable.
Well, given that the cache device has just a cache of data it can easily follow its pool by simply discarding the cached data. Loss of a cache device is harmless even now. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
