On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:37:54AM +0100, Matt Ford wrote:
> I have done some work on http://www.edms.org.uk - that's Early Day MotionS

A lot nicer (graphically) than the official one.

> I'd be grateful if people could give me some *constructive* criticism 
> and not just berate me for giving EDMs more air time than they're worth!

I'd look at your case-adjuster: two things I notice "S.i." v's "S.I."
and "Xvi" instead of "XVI"

"Hot" is a bit populist (or is it just a bit chavvy?), I think;
there's no definition of "hot" that I can see. "Best" is curious,
perhaps "Popular with MPs", instead.

It'd be nice to have something like "This motion has been signed by a
total of 328 (that's 58% of all) MPs." instead of "This motion has
been signed by a total of 328 MPs.".

I'd be interested in being able to sort by MP/Date, with the proposer
frozen/excluded.

On first-look I missed "A total of 1,166 MPs have signed early day
motions. List MPs by name, number of signatures or latest signature.".

Similarily, it'd be interesting for a 'league table' of counts of
proposers (sortable by name, party, constituency): perhaps a
break-down on http://www.edms.org.uk/mps/list_name.htm -- and working
out who are active MPs/those no longer sitting.

Mumble. Again, there's nothing built-in for those who don't use RSS to
get updates.

-- 
``What lawyers call intellectual property is
  no more than theft from the public domain.''  (Andy Mueller-Maguhn)

_______________________________________________
Mailing list [email protected]
Archive, settings, or unsubscribe:
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public

Reply via email to