On 4 August 2011 01:49, Matthew Somerville <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/08/2011 15:19, John Handelaar wrote: > >> Any notion of which sites they came from ? >> > > In July, referers (to anything on the site, not just postcode lookup, > though) were pretty evenly split between direct entry, from another website, > and from a search engine (almost all Google). TheyWorkForYou provided c. > third of "from another website" referers (and many of the others are > webmails of various sort). I guess that's not incredibly useful, as e.g. > delay in clicking confirmation link might mean it counts as a new visit, but > hopefully indicative of... something :) > Heh. Just trying to get an impression of, for example, the difference between how many WTT visitors enter a postcode (the lookup), and how many then proceed to mail someone. Can population-divide the latter number from old statistics but some idea of what sort of costs we'd be looking at here in Crapsville was of interest. But if it's not being tracked, it's not being tracked. In your licensed-up state it probably wasn't a tracked variable, innit jh
_______________________________________________ developers-public mailing list [email protected] https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public Unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/archive%40mail-archive.com
