I like that idea. Maybe we should give it a try. Any good reason not to? Presumably we would discover fairly quickly if it caused more spam-canning problems.
Robin On 14 Mar 2012, at 09:52, Alex Stapleton <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14/03/12 08:26, Mark Goodge wrote: >> My guess is that what's happening is that they've taken the one-time address >> generated by WDTK for the first request, and then stored that in their >> system as your address, and any subsequent requests from you are being >> replied to that address. Or, more simply, whoever is replying is just >> looking for "Paul Perrin" in their Outlook address book and taking the first >> match. > (I am making an awful lot of assumptions about how things work currently here > but...) > > What about instead of sending the message from > > "Paul Perrin <[email protected]>" > > You do > > "Paul Perrin [Title of FOIA Request] <[email protected]>" > > Obviously the responder can still screw up and choose the wrong return > address, this way does seem like it would make it easier to do the right > thing using the erroneous work-flow you described them using. > > _______________________________________________ > developers-public mailing list > [email protected] > https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public > > Unsubscribe: > https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/robin%40mysociety.org _______________________________________________ developers-public mailing list [email protected] https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public Unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/archive%40mail-archive.com
