On 22/03/16 19:18 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:03:12PM +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> On 18/03/16 16:16 +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: >>> So I move to change it to GPLv2+, for everything that is a "program", >>> and LGPLv2.1 for everything that may be viewed as a library. >>> >>> At least that's how I will correct the wording in the >>> affected files in the heartbeat mercurial. >> >> In the light of the presented historic excursion, that feels natural. >> >> Assuming no licensors want to speak up, the question now stands: >> Is it the same conclusion that has been reached by booth and sbd >> package maintainers (Dejan and Andrew respectively, if I follow what's >> authoritative nowadays properly) and are these willing to act on it to >> prevent the mentioned ambiguous interpretation once forever? > > Yes, that's all fine with me. > >> I will be happy to provide actual patches, > > Even better :)
Added the "maint: clarify GPLv2.1+ -> GPLv2+ in the license notices" (e294fa2) commit into https://github.com/ClusterLabs/booth/pull/23 if that's OK with you, Dejan. -- Jan (Poki)
pgpUkyq9jrOa3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Developers mailing list Developers@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers