On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 04:53:57PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 05/04/16 12:33 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:27:20PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > >> On 24/03/16 17:18 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > >>> On 22/03/16 19:18 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:03:12PM +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > >>>>> On 18/03/16 16:16 +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > >>>>>> So I move to change it to GPLv2+, for everything that is a "program", > >>>>>> and LGPLv2.1 for everything that may be viewed as a library. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> At least that's how I will correct the wording in the > >>>>>> affected files in the heartbeat mercurial. > >>>>> > >>>>> In the light of the presented historic excursion, that feels natural. > >>>>> > >>>>> Assuming no licensors want to speak up, the question now stands: > >>>>> Is it the same conclusion that has been reached by booth and sbd > >>>>> package maintainers (Dejan and Andrew respectively, if I follow what's > >>>>> authoritative nowadays properly) and are these willing to act on it to > >>>>> prevent the mentioned ambiguous interpretation once forever? > >>>> > >>>> Yes, that's all fine with me. > >>>> > >>>>> I will be happy to provide actual patches, > >>>> > >>>> Even better :) > >>> > >>> Added the "maint: clarify GPLv2.1+ -> GPLv2+ in the license notices" > >>> (e294fa2) commit into https://github.com/ClusterLabs/booth/pull/23 > >>> if that's OK with you, Dejan. > >> > >> I hope we are all on the same page as Andrew went ahead there (thanks). > >> Alas, I've noticed there were some subtleties neglected in there so, > >> with regrets, a separate (and hopefully final) pull request: > >> > >> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/booth/pull/24 > > > > This got merged too. Thanks! > > Neverending story, it seems. Regrettably, please accept also > https://github.com/ClusterLabs/booth/pull/33 to call this license > clarification effort complete, Dejan.
Will take a look. Cheers, Dejan > -- > Jan (Poki) > _______________________________________________ > Developers mailing list > Developers@clusterlabs.org > http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list Developers@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers