I allready solved it. My confusion was coused by the fact that
<field name="handle" ftype="data"/>
dous not work. But after removing the ftype attribute it was ok. I must
say i find the displytype attribute on the item element a bit of a
mystery. It is not documented and there seems to be a scope issue. If
you declare this item to have a display type of 'image', you suggest
that the entire body contenst should be displayed as an image. bit
funny, that.

regards,

Ernst

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Nico Klasens
> Verzonden: donderdag 13 januari 2005 20:34
> Aan: [email protected]
> Onderwerp: RE: [Developers] image thumbnails in the wizard list items
> 
> 
> You only have to do something like this
> 
>       <item displaytype="image">
>               <field ftype="data" name="title" />
>               <field ftype="startwizard" 
> wizardname="config/images/images" />
>       </item>
> 
> The displaytype will instruct the editwizard to genereate a 
> img-src to the imageservlet. The imageservlet does only 
> support one field (handle) so why should the editwizards support more?
> 
> Nico
> 
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Michiel Meeuwissen
> > Verzonden: dinsdag 11 januari 2005 17:18
> > Aan: Ernst Bunders
> > CC: [email protected]
> > Onderwerp: Re: [Developers] image thumbnails in the wizard 
> list items
> > 
> > 
> > Ernst Bunders wrote:
> > > I discovered that if i use
> > > 
> > > <list role="posrel" destination="images" minoccurs="1" 
> > > orderby="[EMAIL PROTECTED]'pos']" ordertype="number">
> > >    <title>Voeg een plaatje aan dit site onderdeel toe</title>
> > >    <item displaytype="image">
> > >       <field name="handle"/>
> > > 
> > > and omit  the ftype attribute it works, so i guess that is ok. 
> > > thanks anyway
> > 
> > 
> > I don't know if that is ok. It hardly makes sense to me,
> > because the item can contain more than one field, so why is 
> > its displaytype 'image', while only one of its fields is an 
> > image. Your original syntax was easier to understand, isn't 
> > it, and I don't see why it couldn't work. I would not give up 
> > so easily, as far as i'm concerned it's a flaw.
> > 
> > Michiel
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Michiel Meeuwissen                  mihxil'
> > Mediacentrum 140 H'sum                [] ()
> > +31 (0)35 6772979         nl_NL eo_XX en_US
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Developers mailing list
> > [email protected] 
> > http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> [email protected] 
> http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
> 
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers

Reply via email to