Pierre van Rooden wrote: > Would this then be an implementation one would concider as an > appropriate default? > I mean if it is a standard java tool...
That's another discussion. I have no real opinion about it. My unreal opinion is: no. Log4j has proven itself well, and I see no need changing it. Besides the depenency on the external jar I don't see many flaws. Perhaps we could postpone such a decision until later, when people actually had the chance to try in MMBase the java implementation and compare it with the log4j implementation. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil' Mediacentrum 140 H'sum [] () +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
