On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 22:11:22 +0100, Rob van Maris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 1, 2005, at 9:42 PM, Homeijer, Michael wrote: > > > Using Apache BCEL (Byte Code Engineering Library), I create a > > BeanFactory that wraps node with classes that can be evaluated using > > jxpath or EL. > > Great stuff. But for EL both maps and javabeans are suitable, and I > don't see any particular advantage of the latter. Because of this, I > prefer the simplest option which is the first, i.e. a single wrapper > class implementing Map. The difference being that the BeanFactory allows a lot more then the map approach. -editing of a node -getting the relations
It it was only for the taglibs I would choose for the map approach since the taglibs are power full enough to get relations etc. I also see the bean aproach a a possible new way of extending mmbase. For xjpath the map approach is not an option. I don't think either needs to make it to the core., But I like the way Michael is thinking about MMBase and standard apis. _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
