---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kees Jongenburger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 11:14:28 +0000 Subject: Re: BeanFactory (was RE: [Developers] Re: [MMBASE CVS]src/org/mmbase/bridge/util MapNode.java ) To: Joost Diepenmaat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For xjpath the map approach is not an option. I don't think either > > needs to make it to the core., But I like the way Michael is thinking > > about MMBase and standard apis. > > I have no clue what michael is thinking, but I _personally_ think that a > nice extention mechanism on the Nodes is more important than just being > able to use nodes easier in jstl or whatever (since I'm sort of doubting > the added value of taglibs vs scriptlets/jsp methods in general, lately). One problem when using the proxy aproach is that you still can not compile code against a certain api. so what's the next possibility? code generation from uml? jdo like class enhancers? _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
