Ernst Bunders wrote: > I have one question: you propose to postpone the actual transformation > (which is fine), and bring into place a method for gouging the size of > the image when it will be created. I wonder, is it much cheaper to gouge > the size than to do the actual transformation? Is it not simpler to just > do the transformation as soon as the size is requered? or am i missing > something?
I think it is much cheaper to estimate the size, then even to determin the size from a given byte-array (let alone transforming it). These estimations are only a few simple mathematical operations. I will measure the difference though, also because I want to know which implemention of the three 'ImageInformers' is fastest. The size (pixel size I mean) is required immediately (at least in html), because you want to fill in 'height' and 'width' attributes. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil' Mediacentrum 140 H'sum [] () +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list Developers@lists.mmbase.org http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
