Nadia Poulou wrote:
> CALL FOR:
> Integrating of attached Multicast implementation as extra multicast option in
> MMBase 1.7 and 1.8
>
> CALLED BY: Nico Klasens, Andr� van Toly
>
> START OF CALL: 2005-04-13 18:40
> END OF CALL: 2005-04-18 18:40
>
> [X] +1 (YEA)
I don't like the class-names either. I think the 'JG' must be
prefixed. Either in the name or in the package.
(JG/MulticastChangesReceiver.java, or JGMulticastChangesReceiver.java
are both fine with me).
That's more in accordance with code-conventions and english grammar
because a word normally ends in what it is, and is further specified by
prefixed adjectives.
I think it was not specified if the code will be in mmbase 'core'
(mmbase.jar) or in a seperate one ('mmbase-jgroups.jar', maintained in
applications/jgroups or so).
I'm not against either, but have a slight perference for the first one
(simply including those 3 classes in mmase.jar).
Michiel
--
Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil'
Mediacentrum 140 H'sum [] ()
+31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
