Pierre van Rooden wrote: > Kees Jongenburger wrote: > > >Pierre , I think you are twisting the rules. > >of course the code needs a maintainer but voting +1 doesn't mean you > >are a maintainer > > > > > Yes, it does. You cannot just vote for an application and then assume > someone else will do the maintaining - voting +1 for an applications > means that you will be willing to maintain it, if needed. Otherwise, the > statement taht an application should be emnatained by 'the community' is > pretty hollow. > If you expect _someone else_ to maintain it, you should vote it a > contribution.
Of course nobody will be forced with a gun to his head to maintain code though, so all in all it's quite a small distinction here. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil' Peperbus 111 MediaPark H'sum [] () +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
