A note from the side:

I know from my experience with working on Safari / WebKit that these editors are not always compatible with other browsers than IE and Firefox. TinyMCE is getting quite big, and is working hard on becoming compatible with for instance Safari. It's also way beyond it's first release, whereas i understand that Xinha is not...

Also: what does the roadmap of Xinha look like? Or TinyMCE's? What ensures it's still around in 6 months?

Supporting all these editors sounds like a solid plan :)

Just my 2 cents :)

Regards,
Joost

On Jul 10, 2006, at 4:50 PM, Nico Klasens wrote:

Pierre van Rooden wrote:

To make things a bit easier for people to test: the wizard.xsl for tiny_mce.
This assumes tiny_mce (as downloaded from the site) is employed in its entirety under the mmbase/edit/wizard dir.

Okay, let's cnacel the vote and rething about a nice way to support all these editors? Maybe by providing extended wizard.xsl files?

Nico

_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list

Joost de Valk: | www.joostdevalk.nl
contact | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 06 - 24 555 808

Never be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the ark, and professionals built the Titanic.

_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers

Reply via email to