Hi Nico,
Op 10-jul-2006, om 16:50 heeft Nico Klasens het volgende geschreven:
Pierre van Rooden wrote:
To make things a bit easier for people to test: the wizard.xsl for
tiny_mce.
This assumes tiny_mce (as downloaded from the site) is employed in
its entirety under the mmbase/edit/wizard dir.
Okay, let's cnacel the vote and rething about a nice way to support
all these editors? Maybe by providing extended wizard.xsl files?
Maybe your right, but would that not be a lot of work that maybe is
not needed? What are your main reasons for choosing Xinha? I was a
bit put off by it when I tried to integrate it in some JSP editors I
was working on. Then someone pointed me to TinyMCE, since I had not
enough time to evaluate both I have I haven't looked any further.
I believe everybody agrees we should drop HTMLarea but I think it is
a better idea to choose one new one in stead of supporting several.
---André
--
André van Toly
MMBase development & Userfriendly webdesign
W: http://www.toly.nl
M: +31(0)627233562
------------------------------------------------------------------
~~<<>>~~
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
