Hello Nico
I read your document, and I must say i like the initiative. Personally i don't
have strong opinions about this topic, although i think it is an important one.
What i sometimes feel is that it becomes a little unclear where new
functionality pops up (core or bridge) and it becomes even more unclear when
different versions of the same appear in both places (search query) but
different flavor/accent.
It seems to me this kind of stuff should be resolved. Perhaps implementing the
bridge interfaces in the core (and perhaps using decorators to add stuff like
security, caching and so on) is the way, perhaps not.
What i think though is that this subject is a bit heavy for the mailing list.
People try to find a hack proposal in it, which i think is not the idea, as it
is more an invitation to a discussion.
Perhaps this topic is more worthy of a work group or so, because it is important
enough, especially when you consider version 2.0 and perhaps accept backwards
compatibility could be dropped for this release (i don't say that is the
consensus though) That would be an important opportunity, and well worth
thinking about.
regards,
Ernst
Nico Klasens wrote:
Hello Developers,
Just before I went on vacation, a month ago, I wrote a document with my
thoughts on MMBase. I just added some additional stuff to it. I like to
start a discussion how to restructure and improve the MMBase system to
get ready for the next stage. We don't have to implement things right
away, but it could be a goal in the far future where we all can work
towards.
Regards,
Nico
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
