Michiel Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eduard Witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 12:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > This makes sense since the dtd's are tightly coupled to code, so they can > > > be put in the package hierarchy in a meaningful manner. > > > I realize there was opportunity to discuss this preceding the call for > > > vote, but I just returned from vacation today and I still would like to > > > suggest this as an alternative. > > As far as i see it, moving the dtd's to the jar is step one of the > > sollution you describe. > > I think that the approach you describe an good sollution (altrough i > > cant overview how to keep it backwards compatible), but i think we > > should keep the changes maintainable. > > I think all calls to XMLBasicReader must be changed then. I'm ready to try > to make this possible in XMLBasicReader too, but not really feel like > changing all calls in the complete source tree..
I will check it in tonight (unless the vote will be rejected), with the possibility to add the dtd to <calling-files' directory>/resources, (and perhaps will place the 'logging.dtd' in org.mmbase.util.logging.resources as a demo. Mihxil' -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark, C 107 tel. +31 (0)35 6772979
