<Michiel Meeuwissen:> > > I think it is not worth trying to fix it. It should be clear > that 'inheritance' is a new experimental feaure in 1.6, which > needs the new 'storage' implementation (of wich a version for > some databases is shipped in 1.6).
That's acceptable. Still the original database support classes have seen a number of modifications related to "inheritance". Obviously some aspects of inheritance have been implemented here while others have not, and what we end up with is a blurry picture of partly implemented stuff. Looks like it was intended to implement inheritance with the original database support classes, but the work got stranded halfway. I think this proves my point that implementing inheritance, started as a hack, should instead have been a project all along. Rob van Maris Technical Consultant Quantiq xmedia & communication solutions Koninginneweg 11-13 1217 KP Hilversum T +31 (0)356257211 M +31 (0)642258660 E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
