Nico Klasens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In what way is it pluggable?
Approximately in the way you described. > You can customize the prompts based on the language and you can import > the default xsl and override the templates. > We did that in almost all our projects to give it a more professional > look then the default. I prefer to only ovverride the templates when you > need new functionality. The css does not define the full look&feel of > the wizards at the moment. It would already be a good improvement when > it does. If the css can be made better to define the look&feel more completely, then I'm all before that. > I don't think it is a real issue if the wizards have a more professional > look. Maybe, some buttons will move, but when they are on an intuitive > spot then nobody will complain. At the moment, it is not always clear on > which part of the screen the buttons have effect. > Maybe, we can figure out a way to make the wizards more skinnable > without copy&paste a lot of functionality. We'v tried to make smaller xsl templates foccused at the possibility to change lay out without copying (a lot of) functionality. I welcome every initiative in improving it more in this way. (The original xsls of q42 were terrible, you had to copy very large blocks only to change a bit). I ussualy only add some extra style. I think it can become a bit ugly if it suddenly is based on another style sheet (with other colors and so on). So, consicely I agree that small changes in lay out would not matter, but I'm not sure about a rigorous change in the default css and overridable xsl-templates, but I would welcome every change in css and xsl, to make it easier for you (and everybody else) to get it right without copy-pasting. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark C101 Hilversum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
