Jaco de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >So, basicly the countrelations tag is a bit obsolete now. > > Then I would make the countrelations tag deprecated and point to the > example above in the documentation of the countrelations tag.
Hmm yes, perhaps. But on the other hand 'countRelations' is not deprecated in the bridge, and there is no mechanism (yet?) to deprecate a tag. But I added reference to mm:relatednodescontainer and mm:size in doc of mm:countrelations. > > >Furthermore countrleations does not return a list, so I think adding a > >'max' > >attribute on it is a bit silly. Should it simple return max if it would > >otherwise return a bigger number? > > That would be ok. But adding this attribute if you make the tag deprecated > is useless. The other argument against such an attribute is that it is missing on the bridge function as well. Now, the implementation is straightforwardly wrapping the bridge function, and though mm:countrelations is a bit superflouus, is more consise then the relatednodescontainer and existing already and must stay for backwards compatiblity. So I'd say lets do nothing :-) Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark C101 Hilversum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
