Pierre van Rooden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michiel Meeuwissen wrote: > > I also have dangling code about functions, about which it is hard to > harvest > > new reactions, so I might even change my vote to -1 or veto, because I > lack > > clarity about the issue. > > A desire to add new code to a release cannot be a reason to veto, though > you can vote -1. > You can veto the release plan if you are convinced it results in a > broken version, which will cause major problems in current sites. > Please also note that we cannot simply wait forever for projects to > finish or all hacks to be dealt with. In that case we could as well just > stop making releases, because there will always be someone who has a > hack he wants to add.
There is a difference here, namely that it handles about hacks which were requested weeks ago, which were never closed, and about which the discussion simply stopped. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark C101 Hilversum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
