Daniel Ockeloen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > See above there is a clear reason why it was done, i feel its alot > better people are > forced to fix their pages than have a buggy system esp. when mailing > 1000+ people > you don't want it unstable.
I never sent bulk-mail with the old one. Only just one mail, normally from a form on the site to an editor or so. Mailing 1000+ people at once never even came up in my mind :-) Worked just fine. Can you give (perhaps again) a quick rewrite of the code I exampled in my mail. Just to get it optimally clear how (little) involving your hack will be on existing jsp's. > The new examples and docs are not clear ?, the old had timing problems. > > >- A legacy builder is included or reasons are provided why not. > > I think its better we don't since the new one supports the old way > (except for > the little change in the way you mail). The old one is buggy and i for > one > won't fix it (see the vote on it). And it also may not stay in 1.7 for at least one release more? I want that everybody who uses the email-builder now realizes well what that means! We use the email-builder only on a few spots I think, so I will not block this non-backwards-compatible change. But I would like to call also non-commitors to vote on this (even though their vote will not be actually counted, it will give an idea). I do btw not find it a strange demand that some legacy stuff is included, to ease transistions. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark C101 Hilversum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
