[_] +0 (ABSTAIN )

While I like the idea, my experience in last votes is that there is too much discussion of implementation details, and then, when the vote is approved, the implementation is changed.
I think an implementation should have been discussed BEFORE the vote is called, not during.
So I suggest you first offer the code for discussion, and then offer it as a hack.
If you desire to continue the call as is, that is fine, but if a discussion arises that would lead to implementation changes, you will need to make a new vote.


--
Pierre van Rooden
Mediapark, C 107 tel. +31 (0)35 6772815
"Never summon anything bigger than your head."




Reply via email to