Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
Of course. That was my remark too. But how excactly would you implement thatMaybe we need to see the NodeList as "core"? Maybe this problem shows us that we need to look upon this as core. An other option is to make a nodelist in the core and let nodelist extend / use this class.
using bridge? I cannot have a record-set, only a NodeList. Which is fine,
but not in such cases.
ps: I thought that 1.8 was going to be a version with not that much new functionality, but with a lot of performance, caching and restructuring. Would it not be in this line to look at this "problem" and implement it more generic?
