Johannes Verelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michiel Meeuwissen wrote: > >I suggest that these improvements are offered as a 'HACK' together with an > >updated DTD. Then commenting out is not necessary, and everybody can use > >these improvements. > > I agree, these improvements sound very interesting (actually, the last > one fixes a problem that I've been hacking around for the last few > weeks). You have my vote if this code is being proposed as a hack. > > >> <field ftype="startwizard" dynamic="true" inline="true" > >> wizardname="" /> > > > >This looks a bit odd to me. Could nothing be done with an xpath (to access > >the 'virtual' field) in the wizardname in stead? > > The proposed solution doesn't sound that bad to me, because you can put > all the logic of finding the correct editwizard in the builder class, > instead of having to use a lot of xpath. Also, you can't do everything > with xpaths that you can do with with java code.
That was not what I meant. I just meant that perhaps you don't need an extra attribute then, because this field can simply be accessed using xpath. What it returns can be done in the java of the builder class. It seems more generic e.g. because no convention about the name of such a field is needed then. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediacentrum 140 H'sum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
