Ted Vinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had to use the following already, isn't that slower?

I think that is considerably less efficient because you need to iterate. In
my solution everything was done by the database.

>           <c:set var="relatednumber"><mm:field name="number" /></c:set>

We should change MMBase-taglib that you could also have done:
<mm:field id="relatednumber" name="number" /> in stead here, don't you
agree?


Michiel


-- 
Michiel Meeuwissen
Mediacentrum 140 H'sum 
+31 (0)35 6772979
nl_NL eo_XX en_US
mihxil'
 [] ()

Reply via email to