Thanks for quick respons, Michiel!

I had to use the following already, isn't that slower?

<mm:node number="node1">
    <mm:relatednodes type="typenode2" role="posrel">
          <c:set var="relatednumber"><mm:field name="number" /></c:set>
          <c:if test="${relatednumber == node1number}">
               we have a relation!
          </c:if>
    </mm:relatednodes>
</mm:node>

Regards, Ted

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michiel Meeuwissen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: direct relation check between n1 and n2 possible?


> Ted Vinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >    Hi all!
> >
> >    I have been searching through the documentation but I couldn't find a
way
> >    to check whether node 1 has e.g. a posrel-relation with node 2
directly.
> >
> >    Does anyone know such a way? <mm:countrelations> only gives me number
of
> >    relations of a certain type, but I need to know specificly if one
node has
> >    been related to another specific node. Has to be pretty simple, but I
> >    can't see it.
>
>
>
> I'd simply do something like:
> <mm:relatednodescontainer type="object">
>   <mm:constraint field="number" value="$node2" />
>   <mm:size>
>     <mm:compare value="0">
>      No relations!
>     </mm:compare>
>     <mm:compare value="0" inverse="true">
>       <mm:write /> relations!
>     </mm:compare>
>   </mm:size>
> </mm:relatednodescontainer>
>
>  Michiel
>
>
> -- 
> Michiel Meeuwissen
> Mediacentrum 140 H'sum
> +31 (0)35 6772979
> nl_NL eo_XX en_US
> mihxil'
>  [] ()
>


Reply via email to