I think the need is that non-ascii characters work much better. Such a file
would only be needed once (the result is cached) when generating an image
with text. So normally it isn't.
If it is a bug, then it should be fixed and yyou would only need a vote if it breaks backward compatibility.
If it is a hack (extra functionality), then I would want to see more support for it (i.e. other people than Nico and I voting).
I am unsure whether it is one or the other, but I am willing to see it as a bug and leave it to the 'experts' (those that really know what the whole ImageMagick-sucks-with-non-ASCII thing is about).
-- Pierre van Rooden Mediapark, C 107 tel. +31 (0)35 6772815 "Never summon anything bigger than your head."
