Pierre van Rooden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michiel Meeuwissen wrote: > >I think the need is that non-ascii characters work much better. Such a file > >would only be needed once (the result is cached) when generating an image > >with text. So normally it isn't. > > If it is a bug, then it should be fixed and yyou would only need a vote > if it breaks backward compatibility. > If it is a hack (extra functionality), then I would want to see more > support for it (i.e. other people than Nico and I voting). > > I am unsure whether it is one or the other, but I am willing to see it > as a bug and leave it to the 'experts' (those that really know what the > whole ImageMagick-sucks-with-non-ASCII thing is about).
I would be ready to consider it a bug, and would accept the change (automatic use of auxiliary file) as a bugfix. Btw.I think the values of %w and %h should be written in the image object (because ckey sucks, and it would be much simpler), because those are essential sometimes. Calling that too a bugfix would perhaps be too much. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil' Mediacentrum 140 H'sum [] () +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US
