Ernst Bunders wrote: > > These might be good ideas, but I think they must be framed in > > a project (or subproject) if we want > > to actually do something concrete with them. > > Actually I thought we inveted the 'optimization' project to lure > sponsors to pay for the codecleaning as well as the performace while in > fact they are only interested in the latter. From that point of view the > project is there, but we will have to descide if we wat to run the twoo > subprojects serial or in paralell. Correct?
Yes, it would be a 'sub-project' then. And I think it would be silly to postpone anything if there are resources to do it immediately. Of course the idea was to do performance optimalization after code cleaning because that would probably make it easier, but I don't think that would mean that you cannot already look into it. Of course you can decide to clean the performance relative code first... Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil' Mediacentrum 140 H'sum [] () +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US
