Thanks guys - I''l play with log4j as it was not being included in the logging and throwing a very misleading error to the browser.
Regards Emile ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob van Maris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:39 AM Subject: RE: Errors > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Emile > > > > just a suggestion (albeit from a lesser mortal) - to put the > > class and function name into errors. I've struggled for a > > while trying to find the problem I was experiencing, for it > > to end up being something completely different to what I had > > interpreted the error as. Had I known the function that > > threw the error, it would've saved me a lot of time. > > There's no need for this, since Log4J can easily be configured to > include this info in each log message. This is done by setting up an > appropriate layout pattern, see: > http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/api/org/apache/log4j/PatternLayout. > html > > Rob van Maris > Technical Consultant > > Quantiq > xmedia & communication solutions > > Koninginneweg 11-13 > 1217 KP Hilversum > > T +31 (0)356257211 > M +31 (0)651444006 > E [EMAIL PROTECTED] > W http://www.quantiq.com > > > >
