I can only speak for MSSQL:
If you don't establish a system dns, Axapta will do for you, so it just does
some work for you, but it's the same if you use the datasource-field in your
axconfig or not. There's no performance advantage.
For oracle, there are big differences, but I don't know them for sure.
HTH
Herbert
| -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
| Von: sflyz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Gesendet: Dienstag, 08. M�rz 2005 11:01
| An: [email protected]
| Betreff: [development-axapta] Axapta 3.0 Installation - ODBC
| (To use or not to use)
|
|
|
|
| Can anybody please explain the advantages/disadvantages of
| using an Axapta ODBC data source when installing Axapta 3.0
| (both 2-tier client & AOS server). I know that a data source
| is no longer required in version 3 but are there any good
| reasons for still using it.
|
| I've read quite a few forums and nobody seems to have a
| definitive view on this.
|
| Kind Regards,
|
| Pieter Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Yahoo! Groups Sponsor | |
|
|
Yahoo! Groups Links
- To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/development-axapta/
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
