Been there, done that :-)
 
It turns out I was wrong about the sqlserver2005 performing fine. Executing the 
statements directly on the sqlserver2005 is slow as well, and it seems to be 
sorting the data is very slow. Is there any special considerations to be done 
about tempdb ?
 
Regards
Jan S Dahlsgaard
Fujitsu DK

________________________________

Fra: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af 
mit
Sendt: 14. marts 2007 06:26
Til: [email protected]
Emne: RE: [development-axapta] Slow performance with SQLServer2005



Hi

Try to rebuild SQL statistiscs. 

Use Dynamics "long running queries" to determine which plan is used by the
SQL server.

Regards

Michael Troelsen

EG Utility A/S

_____ 

From: [email protected] 
<mailto:development-axapta%40yahoogroups.com> 
[mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:development-axapta%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of Dahlsgaard Jan
Sent: 12. marts 2007 12:36
To: [email protected] 
<mailto:development-axapta%40yahoogroups.com> 
Subject: [development-axapta] Slow performance with SQLServer2005

Hi

This weekend we tried installing a sqlserver2005 on a new server, and
copied our sqlserver2000 database to this server (using backup/restore).
We have been using Axapta 3.0 KR2 for a while, but we now experience
very poor performance. Some forms used to open in seconds, now takes
several minutes. The tables used on the tested forms have cluster
indexes, so this should not be the issue. The sqlserver2005 seems to be
running fine, with no performance problems, but accessing data from
axapta is extremely slow. Any good ideas as to what is the problem ?

Regards
Jan S Dahlsgaard
Fujitsu DK

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by the <http://www.secpoint.com <http://www.secpoint.com> > 
SecPoint Protector 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the SecPoint Protector
for more information please see http://www.secpoint.com 
<http://www.secpoint.com> 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to