On May 18, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Andrew Berry wrote:
On 18-May-09, at 8:37 AM, Mark Shropshire wrote:
Thanks for the instructions on this. You included the step of going
to 5.0 first, then the latest 5.x. I always wondered if this was
necessary.
AFAIK it shouldn't be; Earnie, can you explain why you did it that
way?
The update system as it is designed is technically capable of this,
but managing updates for one release to the next (i.e. 5 to 6) is hard
enough on core developers, and there is no testing done on major
version skip-updates (i.e. 4.7-6) and consequently no support for that.
-Mike
__________________
Michael Prasuhn
[email protected]
http://mikeyp.net
