On 18-May-09, at 5:06 PM, Earnie Boyd wrote:
Quoting Andrew Berry <[email protected]>:On 18-May-09, at 8:37 AM, Mark Shropshire wrote:Thanks for the instructions on this. You included the step of going to 5.0 first, then the latest 5.x. I always wondered if this was necessary.AFAIK it shouldn't be; Earnie, can you explain why you did it that way?Because it ensures that all updates marked for 5.x are made since those updates are not carried to 6.x.
Sorry, I guess I wasn't clear. I was curious as to why you did the extra step of 5.0 to 5.x. Are updates being removed within the 5.x releases? If you had a 4.7.x site, wouldn't you want to go from 4.7.11 directly to 5.18?
--Andrew
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
