Sounds like something to discuss in detail at DrupalCon Chicago and develop an action plan for. :-)

--Larry Garfield

On 1/31/11 5:37 PM, Randy Fay wrote:
I don't think we can delegate any part of Drupal to something we don't
control; I think that's just a non-starter.

So for me, the issue is what we can learn from StackOverflow and friends
- they do great stuff and end up with great content. And yes, I think we
should build something on that.

Who is signing up to build it? I think it's an easy sell.

-Randy

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Dan Horning <dan.horn...@planetnoc.com
<mailto:dan.horn...@planetnoc.com>> wrote:

    i have to ask ... what would we actually gain by doing this -
    cleanup the various methods for finding info about a given module or
    theme or bug a little and we far surpass this suggested tool

    it seems that stackoverflow is driven very highly on userpoints to
    control access - which while a good thing - doesn't really fit the
    development model we have here. there are existing processes that
    would have to change to fit the suggested model. I for one am more
    for peer reviews and leadership staff assigning access than a points
    system that someone could rack up points and just get access ...
    what's that really do for the community - seems that would be great
    if we were just a tech help forum - awarding points for the users
    that help and giving them more access - but what's that do for
    drupal and it's community? (i know there is a potential for this to
    help ...)

    another area of issue to me is - another login ? or would it use SSO?
    do the drupal leadership users and dries have admin level control...?

    mostly here i just don't get what adding yet another resource (like
    has been said before) would do to help the lead devs, module + theme
    devs and just supporting drupal. if i had say -=- i'd vote against
    this idea

    --
    Dan Horning

    ----- Original Message -----
     > From: "Victor Kane" <victork...@gmail.com
    <mailto:victork...@gmail.com>>
     > To: development@drupal.org <mailto:development@drupal.org>
     > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 6:01:55 PM
     > Subject: Re: [development] Drupal Answers: A
    Stackoverflow/StackExchange site proposal
     > I guess this is a good place to start:
     > http://area51.stackexchange.com/faq
     >
     >
     > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Victor Kane <
    victork...@gmail.com <mailto:victork...@gmail.com> >
     > wrote:
     >
     >
     >
     >
     > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Josh Koenig <
    j...@getpantheon.com <mailto:j...@getpantheon.com> >
     > wrote:
     >
     >
     >
     > Stew,
     >
     >
     > Thanks for starting this thread. This is important stuff:
     >
     >
     >
     > http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/2978/drupal-answers
     >
     > I want to put my support behind this proposal and explain my thinking
     > in doing so.
     >
     >
     > The Drupal community is already growing faster than Drupal's
     > infrastructure can easily support. With the release of D7 and all the
     > other associated projects getting off the ground, drupal.org
    <http://drupal.org> is
     > increasingly often a bottleneck or blocker. We have wonderful hosts
     > from OSUOSL, but the human resources needed to develop, maintain and
     > manage our own infrastructure (which is a 24x7x365 job) are limited.
     >
     >
     > We have to pick our battles. I much would rather see energy, effort,
     > attention and money poured into continuing to improve our git and
     > module infrastructure — which is much more deeply intrinsic to the
     > health and future of the project — and accept that even though we
     > *can* build our own StackOverflow (@eaton proved this already) that
     > doesn't necessarily mean it's the best use of limited resources, or
     > the best thing for the project.
     >
     >
     > Drupal can theoretically/technically solve a lot of its own problems,
     > but I think we often suffer from a "not built here" prejudice as a
     > result. In the realm of getting good quality answers to Drupal
     > questions out to the most people possible, I can't see how a
     > StackExchange site would do anything but help. I would love to
    see the
     > community embrace something really cool and useful from the wider
     > Internet as a way to promote the project.
     >
     >
     >
     >
     > You make a convincing argument Josh; my own gut feeling has been,
     > reading this thread, "how can we delegate something so important to
     > the Drupal Community as its own documentation to another party
    who may
     > or may not exist in the near/medium/long term".
     >
     >
     > Can someone inform somewhat on who these guys are? And why there and
     > not someplace else?
     >
     >
     > Victor
     >
     >
     >
     >
     >
     > Finally, I should say that I *do not* think a StackExchange answers
     > site replaces anything. It's not an issue queue, and it's not a
     > replacement for the dialogue that exist in the forums. I would say
     > it's a new resource, something that can help the 10s of 1000s of
     > people who will be trying to wrap their mind around Drupal in the
     > coming year.
     >
     >
     > Cheers
     > -josh




--
Randy Fay
Drupal Module and Site Development
ra...@randyfay.com <mailto:ra...@randyfay.com>
+1  970.462.7450

Reply via email to