On 08/12/2011 13:27, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Thursday, 8 de December de 2011 17.04.09, [email protected] > wrote: >> So, I propose that >> Chief Maintainer + Maintainers + >> Infra. tools Admins get Op status (@ prefix) >> Approvers get Voice status (+ prefix) >> >> Or maybe there's other suggestions? > > Approvers are already given voice status and they have the right to op > themselves in case of trouble. There's no distinction made to maintainers. > > The channel admins are given admin rights, to be able to add maintainers. No > one is given auto-op.
Well, that's a scheme you came up with on your own. I don't recall any discussions on that :) Anyways, my suggestion was just an idea on how to make the voice/op feature _useful_. It's not like we actively use voice/op for anything on our channel anyways (except ops sometimes block clients for a bit when their ISP connection goes haywire and floods the channel will part/join messages, but you are a maintainer (and founder) Thiago, so you'd still be able to do that ;)) -- .marius _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
