On Thursday, 8 de December de 2011 22.25.03, [email protected] wrote: > > Approvers are already given voice status and they have the right to op > > themselves in case of trouble. There's no distinction made to maintainers. > > > > The channel admins are given admin rights, to be able to add maintainers. > > No one is given auto-op. > > Well, that's a scheme you came up with on your own. I don't recall any > discussions on that :)
Yeah, 'tis true. I changed it on the launch date. And the channel admins are
the same as they've been before.
> Anyways, my suggestion was just an idea on how to make the voice/op
> feature _useful_.
>
> It's not like we actively use voice/op for anything on our channel
> anyways (except ops sometimes block clients for a bit when their ISP
> connection goes haywire and floods the channel will part/join messages,
> but you are a maintainer (and founder) Thiago, so you'd still be able to
> do that ;))
You're also founder.
The only time I've needed to use my Op abilities was to ban some people using
the Nokia proxy that time out every 5 minutes and reconnect, flooding the
channel with joins/quits.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
