2012/1/30 Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>:
> That said, I could be convinced that the effort is too great and that the
> possibility of the already-existing bugs showing up. In that case, I could be
> convinced of changing this behaviour in Qt 4.8.1 back to what it was in 4.7.
> But I will definitely not be convinced about that change in Qt 5.

I'm not sure I like that. If it's broken, it should be fixed. 5.0 will
have its own reams of (more important, and hopefully more obvious)
breakage. This happening sooner might be a good thing, one less on the
list of things that will need auditing/fixing when 5.0 is released.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to