On Tuesday, 31 de January de 2012 10.34.52, [email protected] wrote: > On 30 January 2012 17:34 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > There was no break of binary or source compatibility. It was a change of > > behaviour because the previous behaviour was considered buggy (by me). > > > > Every bug fix is a change in behaviour. > > Your reasons why this change is neede make a lot of sense. Still I feel that > this change is a bit more than just a bug fix. How toLocalFile() behaves > for relative urls was not clearly specified in the documentation, and I > feel that one could reasonably expect either result. Thus the the behaviour > was implicitly defined by the implementation. > > I still feel that for 4.8.1 it would be best to revert function to work like > it did in 4.7, and perhaps add a note to documentation that it works like > this in 4.x to maintain compatability, but the behaviour will change in > 5.0. And with this note, toLocalFile() and isLocalFile() could use a > different logic in 4.8.
Fair enough.
Other opinions around? Olivier has already said he's for reverting to the old
4.7 behaviour.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
