> Hello. > > When I tried to use QtCreator in my current development projects based > on C++11 features I was faced with some issues in qtc internal C++ > parser. One of such issues (code completion support for auto > variables) I recently fixed and pushed into master qtc branch. I could > try to fix others, but I think what it will be waste of time if clang > frontend will be integrated into qtc in the near future. May be my > help in this integration could be more useful. So, my question is: > which help is needed? Should I try to fix current version of C++ > parser or it will better if I focus on clang wrapper?
ATM they don't know which route they will go. Maybe they will drop clang because it is much slower then the old parser, maybe they switch to clang. In any case, your risk to waste your time. I personally prefer clang (maybe only optionally), but I stopped testing it because of the 'maybe'. Peter -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
