On Tuesday 31 January 2012 17:39:28 ext Peter Kuemmel wrote: > > Hello. > > > > When I tried to use QtCreator in my current development projects based > > on C++11 features I was faced with some issues in qtc internal C++ > > parser. One of such issues (code completion support for auto > > variables) I recently fixed and pushed into master qtc branch. I could > > try to fix others, but I think what it will be waste of time if clang > > frontend will be integrated into qtc in the near future. May be my > > help in this integration could be more useful. So, my question is: > > which help is needed? Should I try to fix current version of C++ > > parser or it will better if I focus on clang wrapper? > > ATM they don't know which route they will go. Maybe they will drop > clang because it is much slower then the old parser, maybe they > switch to clang. In any case, your risk to waste your time. > > I personally prefer clang (maybe only optionally), but I stopped > testing it because of the 'maybe'.
The actual route will be chosen by the people that do the work. If you don't contribute to either route - even at the risk that someone on the "other" route is faster or better - your impact on the final outcome might be limited... ;-) [Apart from that I currently think that the solution in the end will be some kind of a hybrid, so the risk to waste time is very low] Regards, Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
