On 09/02/2012 12:13, ext [email protected] wrote: > On 09/02/2012 10:33, ext Manuel Nickschas wrote: >> I'd be happy to see Qt use or at least support more standard >> solutions over homegrown ones. Since that failed for localization, >> maybe we can at least get it for documentation :) > > I think there are a few issues here: > > 1) Only Dimitri touches Doxygen code, and it doesn't look like > contributions go in (at least not under the authors name). This means > that the functionality to support Qt's extensive documentation needs to > be implemented by Dimitri alone. Thus, Nokia's team cannot be working on > enhancing Doxygen to get it up to par with the current output from qdoc.
Btw, all purely based on http://doxygen.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/doxygen/trunk/ and committers I can see in the revision logs. I have not been in contact with Dimitri on the matter, but I do see a "call to action" in http://old.nabble.com/Doxygen-support-for-QML---td32658060.html. So perhaps a wrong assumption on my part. -- .marius _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
