On sábado, 7 de julho de 2012 02.12.42, Olivier Goffart wrote: > Anyway, if we want to support that version of clang, this still need to be > worked around, so I suggest that the problematic code should be #ifdef'd > out for the 'broken' versions of clang.
We also need to know which version fixes the bug so we can apply a correct
version fix. And the Apple clang version and how to figure out when it is Apple
clang.
For now, I'd say we blacklist constexpr in Clang.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
