On Saturday 07 July 2012 07:33:56 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sábado, 7 de julho de 2012 02.12.42, Olivier Goffart wrote: > > Anyway, if we want to support that version of clang, this still need to be > > worked around, so I suggest that the problematic code should be #ifdef'd > > out for the 'broken' versions of clang. > > We also need to know which version fixes the bug so we can apply a correct > version fix. And the Apple clang version and how to figure out when it is > Apple clang. > > For now, I'd say we blacklist constexpr in Clang.
This has nothing to do with constexpr It is the aggregate initialisation that has a small bug. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
