Hi, On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday 11 July 2012 18:50:15 Stephen Kelly wrote: >> So, either the code should stay as is - leaving the signals private and >> making function pointer connects not work, or the patches should be >> applied, making function pointer connects work. >> >> Making the signals public is not an option for me. > > I personally beleive allowing the new syntax is more important than keeping > those signal private. > Anyway, i'm quite happy with the current implementation in moc. >
Is this really important given that we are in feature freeze? Changes to moc, however small, is not advisable at all. Girish _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
